Canterbury Property Boundaries and Related Matters Bill
The departmental disclosure statement for a government Bill seeks to bring together in one place a range of information to support and enhance the Parliamentary and public scrutiny of that Bill.
It identifies:
- the general policy intent of the Bill and other background policy material;
- some of the key quality assurance products and processes used to develop and test the content of the Bill;
- the presence of certain significant powers or features in the Bill that might be of particular Parliamentary or public interest and warrant an explanation.
This disclosure statement was prepared by Land Information New Zealand.
Land Information New Zealand certifies that, to the best of its knowledge and understanding, the information provided is complete and accurate at the date of finalisation below.
12 October 2015
Part One: General Policy Statement
The purpose of this Bill is to clarify the law relating to locating legal property boundaries on land affected by movement resulting from the 2010 and 2011 Canterbury earthquake sequences. The purpose is also to provide for guidelines to be issued about standards set under the Cadastral Survey Act 2002, to assist with boundary determinations in greater Christchurch after the earthquake sequences but also for more general use in future to maintain public confidence in the cadastre.
Properties in greater Christchurch were affected by land movement resulting from the 2010 and 2011 earthquake sequences. In the worst affected areas, it has been difficult for surveyors to locate legal property boundaries because the measurements between survey pegs and marks in the ground may no longer match those recorded on the official survey plans.
In these cases, it has been difficult for surveyors to identify and interpret physical evidence of boundaries, all of which moved with land movement, in light of the generally accepted principle that legal property boundaries are fixed except in the case of gradual and imperceptible water boundary movement.
This uncertainty has resulted in surveys taking longer to complete, reluctance by some surveyors to undertake surveys in the worst‑affected areas, more cost to property owners, and delays to rebuilding work.
The Bill addresses this problem by providing that legal boundaries of land in greater Christchurch have moved with land movement caused by the 2010 and 2011 Canterbury earthquake sequences.
The Bill also provides for the Surveyor-General to issue guidance for surveyors, in order to achieve consistent interpretations of, and improved compliance with, rules and standards made under the Cadastral Survey Act 2002.
To enhance clarity and certainty the Bill also:
- confirms that a registered landowner under the Land Transfer Act 1952 continues to enjoy all the benefits of registration, including indefeasibility and the Crown guarantee;
- confirms that a survey approved by Land Information New Zealand in the interim period (after the earthquakes and before the commencement of this Bill) continues to determine the boundaries surveyed;
- confirms that licensed cadastral surveyors and the Crown will not be liable for surveys done and approved in the interim period merely because they were done on the basis that the boundaries did or did not move with the land; and
- provides that certain boundary corrections that arise from the Bill will not be a subdivision for the purposes of the Resource Management Act 1991 (and therefore will not require a subdivision consent).
Part Two: Background Material and Policy Information
Published reviews or evaluations
|
|
|
Relevant international treaties
|
|
Regulatory impact analysis
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
| |
| |
2.3.2. Are there aspects of the policy to be given effect by this Bill that were not addressed by, or that now vary materially from, the policy options analysed in these regulatory impact statements? | NO |
Extent of impact analysis available
|
|
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
| |
| |
| |
|
|
|
|
Part Three: Testing of Legislative Content
Consistency with New Zealand’s international obligations
|
|
Consistency with the government’s Treaty of Waitangi obligations
|
|
Consistency with the New Zealand Bill of Rights Act 1990
|
|
Offences, penalties and court jurisdictions
| |
|
|
|
|
Privacy issues
|
|
External consultation
|
|
|
Other testing of proposals
|
|
Part Four: Significant Legislative Features
Compulsory acquisition of private property
|
|
Charges in the nature of a tax
|
|
Retrospective effect
|
|
Strict liability or reversal of the usual burden of proof for offences
| |
|
|
|
|
Civil or criminal immunity
|
|
Significant decision-making powers
|
|
Powers to make delegated legislation
|
|
| |
|
|
Any other unusual provisions or features
|
|